Company A is two weeks away from filing an IPO when it discovers
that it has the rights to its domain name as an URL but can’t trademark it. The
IPO is put on hold as the lawyers begin negotiating furiously with the owner of
the trademark name. He starts the bargaining at a quarter of a million dollars.
Company B finds the perfect domain name for its new e-commerce
site, but ends up having to pay $3 million for the right to use it.
Company C finds that $10 million worth of television advertising
goes largely down the drain because consumers confuse it with every other
e-retailer in its segment that uses "e" or ".com" in its names.
Company D discovers that customers don’t connect its many
software products with the corporate brand, interfering with its ongoing
positioning with the investment community.
Company E realizes that its current name no longer matches its
marketplace positioning as a result of the successful implementation of its
e-strategy.
These examples — all true — demonstrate that naming, both for
companies and products, can’t be an afterthought of the branding process. The
fact is, it’s a lot cheaper to change your name before you trot it out to
consumers, business customers and investors.
The best-named tech products demonstrate that customers don’t
buy products because they’re "tech" — they buy products that promise something
of value. In branding speak, the brand creates a bond between the customer and
the company. Point being, tech products naming is no different from regular
consumer products naming.
Looked at that way, over-emphasizing the tech aspect can
actually be detrimental. In most cases, tech isn’t what you’re selling — tech is
more likely a vehicle to get to what you’re selling. Certainly that’s the case
with e-commerce of all sorts.
Look at the companies that do tech naming right. IBM’s Aptiva
and Compaq’s Presario are good examples of tech products whose names bespeak
product attributes and customer aspirations — not just tech. Yahoo! took the
same road in creating an Internet portal. Fatbrain.com used its new name to draw
attention to itself as the Internet's most comprehensive bookstore for
professionals as well as the concept of intellectual stimulation on the web.
Microsoft has done a great job in leveraging a master brand that
supports products ranging from word processing software to e-commerce services.
Amazon.com is one of the best examples of a dot-com name that
works equally well in both its domain and non-domain name usages because it has
come to symbolize the success of e-retailing.
What about the "e" construction? eBay, e-Toys and, on the B2B
side, e-trade — all of which are very successful. The danger here, however, is
choosing a name that fits today but not tomorrow, as the craze for dot-com names
fades.
Does that mean that "techie names" are a bad idea? No. But it
means that tech companies need to understand the larger proposition.
First, a brand is the promise of an experience — more than just
a catchy name, more than just a trademarkable name, and more than just a good
URL. It has to help consumers clarify their choices.
Second, a brand is a fusion of the emotional with the functional
components of a product or service.
Third, it is the relationship between the product and the
consumer that secures future revenue by securing preference and loyalty.
The real trick when you’re starting off is to create a name that
facilitates what Interbrand calls Destination Branding™, a unique method in
which brand name development and total brand vision are inextricably bound.
Destination Branding™ enables us to create brand names that don’t just label a
product or service, but rather help brand it. In other words Destination
Branding™ creates names that help take brands further, transcending the physical
benefits of the product to create an experience that the consumer identifies
with -- presenting a lifestyle they aspire to. Take for example Expedia.com in
the travel services industry or the phenomenally successful Starbucks and Nike.
And let’s not forget Yahoo! (especially as it compares to other search engines
like InfoSeek and AltaVista, which seemingly have created far less of an
emotional connection with customers).
So does the right name still matter? You bet — because it’s the
calling card, the scene-setter and the one-second summary of all of the branding
you’ll ever do.
Julie Cottineau is Naming Director at Interbrand in New York.
Copyright © 2001-2004 brandchannel. All rights reserved.
|